Interconnectivity Among BRICS Municipalities as a Key Aspect of the Broader Discourse on Urban Development and Governance
https://doi.org/10.24833/2949-639X-2024-3-9-110-117
Abstract
The BRICS International Municipal Forum represents a significant achievement in international cooperation, marking an important advancement towards a new multipolar world order. This emerging paradigm stands in contrast to the unipolar world dominated by American hegemony and challenges the established norms of the New World Order of the World Economic Forum. The interconnectivity among municipalities within BRICS countries plays a vital role in shaping the broader discourse on urban development and governance. This paper explores the dynamics of municipal cooperation, knowledge sharing, and infrastructure development within BRICS, with a particular emphasis on the importance of inter-municipal networks in addressing common urban challenges. Furthermore, it presents examples of collaboration among cities and municipalities in these emerging economies on issues such as economic development, smart city initiatives, sustainable urban planning, and governance reforms. By enhancing interconnectivity, BRICS municipalities have the potential to foster innovation, resilience, and inclusive growth while contributing to global urban policy frameworks. Furthermore, the article highlights the capability of these collaborations to influence both regional and international standards of urban governance, thereby positioning BRICS municipalities as key players in the global urbanisation process
References
1. Alderson A.S., Beckfield J., Sprague-Jones J. Intercity Relations and Globalisation: The Evolution of the Global Urban Hierarchy, 1981-2007. Urban Studies, 2010, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1899-1923. DOI:10.1177/0042098010372679
2. Christidis P., Cawood E.N. Fiorello D. Challenges for urban transport policy after the Covid-19 pandemic: Main findings from a survey in 20 European cities. Transport Policy, 2022, vol. 129, pp. 105-116. DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.007
3. Chuyuan Z., Germa B., Mildred E.W. High-speed rail accessibility: a comparative analysis of urban access in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Madrid, and Barcelona. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2014, no. 14(4), pp. 468-488. DOI:10.18757/ ejtir.2014.14.4.3048
4. Hamnett C. The changing social class structure of London, 2001-2021: Continued professionalisation or asymmetric polarisation? Urban Studies, 2024, vol. 61, no. 9, pp, 1666-1658. DOI:10.1177/00420980231213280
5. Mohanty M. Globalization and Cities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, Switzerland, Springer, 2020, pp. 204-215.
6. Udeagha M.C., Muchapondwa E. Green finance, fintech, and environmental sustainability: fresh policy insights from the BRICS nations. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2023, no. 30(1), pp. 633-649. DOI:10.1080/13504509.202 3.2183526
7. Vandecasteele I., Baranzelli C., Siragusa A. et al. The Future of Cities: Opportunities, challenges and the way forward, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 2019, 164 p.
8. Xuan D., Jiang X., Fang Y. Can globalization and the green economy hedge natural resources? Functions of population growth and financial development in BRICS countries, Resources Policy, 2023, vol. 82(C). DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103414
Review
For citations:
Conedera M. Interconnectivity Among BRICS Municipalities as a Key Aspect of the Broader Discourse on Urban Development and Governance. International Business. 2024;(3 (9)):110-117. https://doi.org/10.24833/2949-639X-2024-3-9-110-117
Views:
37
Email this article 